LogoLogo
English
English
  • INSPIRED: Where policy meets dialogue
  • Who is this website for?
    • Civil society and domestic stakeholders
    • Development practitioners and EU representatives
    • Government officials
  • Guide
    • What is INSPIRED?
    • Why does INSPIRED make a difference?
      • A three-tier approach
    • How does INSPIRED work in practice?
      • A dialogue process in three phases
        • Collective Assessment Phase
          • The Participatory Policy Analysis (PPA)
        • Consensus Building Phase
          • The Roadmap for Reform
            • Balancing priorities and trade-offs
            • Considering the policy cycle
            • Structure
            • Types of Roadmaps for Reform
            • Unlocking the black box of “political will”
        • Monitoring and Donor Alignment Phase
          • Monitoring the recommendations of the Roadmap for Reforms
          • Ensuring the alignment of donor support to the priorities outlined in the Roadmap
          • The Policy Network Strategy
            • The Joint Analysis of the Policy Network
            • The network graph
            • The exercise of strategic foresight
      • Measuring progress: The Integrated Support Framework (ISF)
    • Who is involved?
      • The Donor(s)
        • Opening the space for dialogue‌
        • Building incentives through conditionality
        • Providing actors with access to decision-makers
        • Promoting the adoption of international standards
        • Bringing in experiences and good practices to feed deliberation
      • The Partner Government
        • Appointing the right person(s)
        • Providing access to government data
        • Coordinating the participation of the concerned public actors
        • Honouring the commitments collectively agreed through dialogue
        • Allocating resources for the implementation of the roadmap
      • The Dialogue Host
        • Convening the key stakeholders
        • Facilitating the dialogue sessions
        • Promoting knowledge-sharing among stakeholders
        • Coordinating the division of labour
        • Acting as the main hub of the resulting policy network
        • Reporting and keeping track of the collective progress
      • The Stakeholders
        • Civil Society Organisations
        • Political parties
        • Public administration
        • Parliaments
        • Media
        • Social agents
        • National Human Rights institutions
        • Academia
        • Democracy support organisations
    • What change can INSPIRED bring?
      • Types of change
      • Harvesting INSPIRED outcomes
  • The INSPIRED Toolkit
    • Results-orientation
    • Three categories
    • The tools
      • 1. Scoping the policy landscape
      • 2. Determining the stage of the policy cycle
      • 3. Stakeholder mapping
      • 4. Set-up and follow-up of indicators
      • 5. Deliberation around evaluative criteria
      • 6. Joint Research
      • 7. Workshops and focus groups
      • 8. Public events & campaigning
      • 9. Bilateral meetings
      • 10. Working groups
      • 11. High-level missions
      • 12. Workshops on multi-party dialogue
      • 13. Study visits
      • 14. Online consultations
      • 15. Grant schemes
      • 16. Training courses
      • 17. Coaching
      • 18. Network mapping
      • 19. International Peer to Peer support
  • Resources
    • Library
      • Policy dialogue: General
      • Policy analysis for dialogue facilitation
      • Dialogue stakeholders
      • Trust-building
      • Policy dialogue in thematic policies
      • EU democracy support
    • Track record
    • Contact us
  • LEGAL NOTICE
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo
On this page
  1. Guide
  2. Who is involved?
  3. The Dialogue Host

Facilitating the dialogue sessions

Given the importance of trust in promoting consensus, as well as in bridging and bonding the stakeholders that are part of the policy network, the INSPIRED Dialogue Host will most likely need to make use of a wide array of facilitation techniques to oil the wheels of the dialogue process and overcome the conflicts that may arise along the way. Most of these facilitation techniques belong to the family of Participatory Action Research (see the section above on “building trust through sponsored policy dialogue”), a practical approach that recognises and values other forms of knowledge besides the official and rather a technical kind of evidence usually taken as reference by public actors. This recognition often has an empowering effect among the weakest stakeholders, and it can also broaden the perspective of public officials through the adoption of other qualitative insights that are often neglected by official data/statistics.

Almost by definition, a dialogue process pushes the participants out of their comfort zone, as it forces them to put themselves in someone else’s shoes and realize the difficulties the others encounter in their own areas of work. As a result, an already human-driven process becomes, for good or evil, even more affected by human dynamics. which means that the Dialogue Host will need to handle the attitudes, prejudices and fears of the people that take part in the dialogue. Overly high expectations can result in frustration and disappointment, while the awareness of interdependence can make others pull back from the collective effort and try to regain autonomy by isolating themselves. To make things even more complicated, human attitudes are impregnated by organizational roles, and personal and institutional interests are quite difficult to tell apart.

These complexities highlight the reason why the Dialogue Host always needs to be local. To begin with, participants need to express themselves in their own language in order for the dialogue to be meaningful. Besides, foreigners can hardly grasp the many cultural nuances and social codes at play, as well as the complex web of interests and relations that any local immediately digs but that will certainly escape any newcomer. Most importantly, local actors will seldom develop true ownership over the dialogue process and its outcomes if it is being steered or facilitated by an international organisation – with an exception for those cases in which the staff is also local and the stakeholders feel that they are engaging with fellow countrymen.

PreviousConvening the key stakeholdersNextPromoting knowledge-sharing among stakeholders

Last updated 1 year ago