LogoLogo
English
English
  • INSPIRED: Where policy meets dialogue
  • Who is this website for?
    • Civil society and domestic stakeholders
    • Development practitioners and EU representatives
    • Government officials
  • Guide
    • What is INSPIRED?
    • Why does INSPIRED make a difference?
      • A three-tier approach
    • How does INSPIRED work in practice?
      • A dialogue process in three phases
        • Collective Assessment Phase
          • The Participatory Policy Analysis (PPA)
        • Consensus Building Phase
          • The Roadmap for Reform
            • Balancing priorities and trade-offs
            • Considering the policy cycle
            • Structure
            • Types of Roadmaps for Reform
            • Unlocking the black box of “political will”
        • Monitoring and Donor Alignment Phase
          • Monitoring the recommendations of the Roadmap for Reforms
          • Ensuring the alignment of donor support to the priorities outlined in the Roadmap
          • The Policy Network Strategy
            • The Joint Analysis of the Policy Network
            • The network graph
            • The exercise of strategic foresight
      • Measuring progress: The Integrated Support Framework (ISF)
    • Who is involved?
      • The Donor(s)
        • Opening the space for dialogue‌
        • Building incentives through conditionality
        • Providing actors with access to decision-makers
        • Promoting the adoption of international standards
        • Bringing in experiences and good practices to feed deliberation
      • The Partner Government
        • Appointing the right person(s)
        • Providing access to government data
        • Coordinating the participation of the concerned public actors
        • Honouring the commitments collectively agreed through dialogue
        • Allocating resources for the implementation of the roadmap
      • The Dialogue Host
        • Convening the key stakeholders
        • Facilitating the dialogue sessions
        • Promoting knowledge-sharing among stakeholders
        • Coordinating the division of labour
        • Acting as the main hub of the resulting policy network
        • Reporting and keeping track of the collective progress
      • The Stakeholders
        • Civil Society Organisations
        • Political parties
        • Public administration
        • Parliaments
        • Media
        • Social agents
        • National Human Rights institutions
        • Academia
        • Democracy support organisations
    • What change can INSPIRED bring?
      • Types of change
      • Harvesting INSPIRED outcomes
  • The INSPIRED Toolkit
    • Results-orientation
    • Three categories
    • The tools
      • 1. Scoping the policy landscape
      • 2. Determining the stage of the policy cycle
      • 3. Stakeholder mapping
      • 4. Set-up and follow-up of indicators
      • 5. Deliberation around evaluative criteria
      • 6. Joint Research
      • 7. Workshops and focus groups
      • 8. Public events & campaigning
      • 9. Bilateral meetings
      • 10. Working groups
      • 11. High-level missions
      • 12. Workshops on multi-party dialogue
      • 13. Study visits
      • 14. Online consultations
      • 15. Grant schemes
      • 16. Training courses
      • 17. Coaching
      • 18. Network mapping
      • 19. International Peer to Peer support
  • Resources
    • Library
      • Policy dialogue: General
      • Policy analysis for dialogue facilitation
      • Dialogue stakeholders
      • Trust-building
      • Policy dialogue in thematic policies
      • EU democracy support
    • Track record
    • Contact us
  • LEGAL NOTICE
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo
On this page
  1. The INSPIRED Toolkit
  2. The tools

12. Workshops on multi-party dialogue

Type of tool: Capacity development and Trust building.

Purpose

To familiarise the participants with the multi-party approach used to broker consensus among political parties in complex contexts.

Rationale

Policy is inextricably linked to politics, so political parties will become, sooner or later, involved in any given policy reform. Due to their partisan nature and the confrontational dynamics that the electoral process imposes on them, their participation in policy dialogue processes is always very sensitive, as they very often lack the incentives to reach a compromise that may benefit their adversaries. In other words, in most cases, their engagement in dialogue is informed by electoral calculations and the kind of power games that can seriously jeopardize the trust dynamics championed by INSPIRED.

However, there are certain aspects in which politics can stop being perceived as a zero-sum game and improve the situation of all the parties involved. Departing from this assumption, the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD) has a long track record in promoting cooperation among otherwise confronted political actors with views to achieving basic consensus on key issues for the quality of democracy and the country’s development. Such experience is extremely useful when tackling the political dimension implicit in any policy reform and ensuring that political parties either endorse the Roadmap for Reform resulting from the dialogue process –or at least commit to not boycotting it.

Outcomes

  • Political parties are strategically involved in the dialogue process (“strategically” meaning that they are prevented from co-opting it and alter its consensual spirit through partisan calculations).

  • Positions from political parties with regard to the policy at stake are reassessed and, in some cases, modified in line with the commitments resulting from the dialogue.

  • The policy reform at stake finds its way into the country’s political agenda.

Previous11. High-level missionsNext13. Study visits

Last updated 1 year ago